The many internet forums that discuss Freeman and Commercial Redemption research right across the globe generally accept certain theories as self-evident, on the simplisitc basis that there is a tangible resonance of truth about them, even if there is little material evidence in support of the original hypotheses, which include [without limitation]:
In spite of the common parlance of our times, a person is not a human being.
From Bouvier’s:
In law, man and person are not exactly-synonymous terms. Any human being is a man, whether he be a member of society or not, whatever may be the rank he holds, or whatever may be his age, sex, &c. A person is a man considered according to the rank he holds in society, with all the rights to which the place he holds entitles him, and the duties which it imposes. 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 137.
Contrary to every day usage of bills of exchange, all money is debt.
Since all forms of legal currency since the abolition of the gold and silver standards are nothing more than a promise to pay the bearer the value of the pledge, as evidenced by every bank note currently in public circulation, it is easy to conclude that all money is debt, which brings us rather neatly to the third statement, the sustaining of which is not so straightforward.
Since the abolition of the Gold Standard in 1931, the Bank of England has created money out of thin air.
Unpopular among the research community though this opinion may be, I no longer believe that money is created ‘out of thin air’, as has been postulated by well researched underground documentaries such as MONEY MASTERS, MONEY AS DEBT and ZEITGEIST. That is to say, I do not believe that any kind of genuine pledge or promise to do something for another party is worthless, which is seemingly the entire foundation of the argument that a Promissory Note has no intrinsic value.
Put in the most simplistic terms, if that were the case it would be impossible for the myriad of transactions which are executed every second of the day to be carried out. In other words, all commercial business would have no means of facilitation and there would be no acceptable means of exchange for goods and services to be acquired and delivered.
Furthermore, if a promise is not worth the paper it is written on, that renders every notice, affidavit and claim signed, sealed and served by freemen all over the English-speaking world completely meaningless, which I have learned from direct experience is emphatically not the case. On the contrary, the promises I have made in a veritable plethora of missives have provided my actions with the standing necessary to prevent eroneous legal proceedings being issued against my person. Therefore, I am unable to consider a promise to pay worthless.
As the Bank of England state in their own literature, credit is created when bank’s draw cheques or similar instruments on themselves. These instruments, sometimes known as Certificates of Desposit, are then special deposited in private trust accounts, with the public side of the account receiving the line of credit, generated by nothing more than the banker’s promise to pay.
This type of transaction is recognised internationally as Double-Entry Bookkeeping; a debt is zeroed by the credit it creates of the same value. The problem is that the banksters have been loaning us money we unwittingly created, adding interest and raking up the unclaimed credit as abandoned funds, usually within three days of our failure to issue specific instructions to execute the foregoing.
The remedy for this common practice of corruption is one that I have been studiously developing over the last eighteen months, not without a tangible degree of progress. Updates in this regard will be posted on this thread, as and when success is a foregone conclusion.
